Reflections about the work in the classroom-workshop to understand a disciplinary text

Authors

  • Ivone Gabriela Quispe Instituto de Teoría Historia y Crítica del Diseño (IDIS) | Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño | Universidad Nacional de San Juan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1185-9008
  • Fernando Giudici Instituto de Teoría Historia y Crítica del Diseño (IDIS) | Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño | Universidad Nacional de San Juan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7578-9769
  • Augusto Núñez Instituto de Teoría Historia y Crítica del Diseño (IDIS) | Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño | Universidad Nacional de San Juan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5849-3683
  • Cecilia Torres Instituto de Teoría Historia y Crítica del Diseño (IDIS) | Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño | Universidad Nacional de San Juan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5273-6691
  • Marisol Vedia Instituto de Teoría Historia y Crítica del Diseño (IDIS) | Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño | Universidad Nacional de San Juan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3660-1003

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/24690090e110

Keywords:

reading comprehension, academic writing, didactic strategy

Abstract

The present work is framed in the internal research project of FAUD-UNSJ "Didactic configurations for the approach to the field of Theory, history and architectural criticism in the first year of the Architecture and Urbanism career". The theoretical material with which this article was addressed belongs to the bibliography of the course "Theory and didactic application in university education" of the Teacher Training career of the FFHA-UNSJ Postgraduate Secretariat. The development of this work consisted in the description of what was planned and what happened in the classroom of four meetings: classes-workshop. With the objective of reflecting to rethink contextualized didactic strategies in the complex and diverse classroom of "today". The expected results are diagnostic regarding the handling of texts and thus be able to promote the construction and appropriation of the habit of academic reading and writing from a more conscious place, for the students. It is expected that the chair can strengthen and deepen these exercises of observation, analysis and reflection of teaching practice. And, finally, that it be a contribution to the planning of the subject for the following year and to the final report of the internal project.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anijovich, R. y Mora, S. (2010). Estrategias de enseñanza. Otra mirada al quehacer en el aula. Aique grupo editor.

Gvirtz, S. y Palamidessi, M. (2006). El ABC de la tarea docente: currículum y enseñanza, Aique grupo editor.

Cátedra IPP. (2019). Planificación de cátedra, Introducción al pensamiento proyectual, FAUD-UNSJ.

Maggio, M. (2018). Reinventar la clase en la universidad. Paidós.

Quiroga, R. B. y Bunge, P. D. (2022). Teoría y aplicación didáctica en la enseñanza universitaria, FoDo, FFHA-UNSJ.

Published

2022-12-29

How to Cite

Quispe, I. G., Giudici, F., Núñez, A., Torres, C., & Vedia, M. (2022). Reflections about the work in the classroom-workshop to understand a disciplinary text. Trayectorias Universitarias, 8(15), 110. https://doi.org/10.24215/24690090e110